Learn more about this license, and discover what can and cannot be done under it. Using gpllicensed components in proprietary projects. But the wording of both the license and the faq is misleading, and the suggestion that you can gpl your commercial software is disingenuous. Gpllgpl software the product includes software licensed under gnu general public license gpl or gnu lesser general public license lgpl. Qgis is a user friendly open source geographic information system gis licensed under the gnu general public license. Its built with and comes with an awful lot of gpld software. Gpl software can be used anywhere, without restrictions.
You can sell your commercial software under its own licence and not ship it with the gpl addons. I again dont so much care about the ethics bsds just fine as i do about the commercial impact. Free software licence openfoam is distributed by the openfoam foundation and is freely available and open source, licensed under the gnu general public licence. After all, while gplv2 is one of the most popular foss licenses accounting for up to threequarters of all foss projects according to the most commonly used figure that still leaves a large proportion of projects that use other licenses, such as the apache or bsd licenses, for whom the question of using gplv3 is a nonstarter. The free software foundation recommends taking the additional step of adding a boilerplate notice to the top of each file.
The differences between the gpl, lgpl and the bsd fosswire. Mar 29, 2007 it addresses situations where a company, such as tivo, sells a hardware product that runs free software, and releases the source code of their modified version of the software satisfying the gplv2, but employs some technological measure to prevent the installation of usermodified versions of the software onto the hardware. You can distribute your application using a gpl library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. There are two main elements to the gpl, designed to prevent open source software being exploited by their inclusion within nonfree, closed sourced software products. Piskyhi writes i understand that if i build an application that links with a library that is licensed under gplv2, i must also make my application gpl2. The fraunhofer aac library fdkaac is under a license incompatible with the. A tale of two copyleft licenses while determining the proper methodology and criteria to yield an accurate count remains difficult, the gpl is generally considered one of the most widely used free software licenses. Oct 31, 2014 promulgated in 1991, gplv2 is still after 23 years in service, the most widely used free software license of any type. Frequently asked questions about version 2 of the gnu gpl. Can software licensed under the gplv2 be modified and then. If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporatecommercial environment. Nov 19, 20 with that said, dear techrepublic reader, the short answer to your first question is. If he conveys software that contains modified or unmodified components that are licensed in under the gpl, his own product is also subject to the gpl.
Dec 06, 2004 clarification of answer by maniacga on 12 dec 2004 20. The implication is that gpled software is not necessarily free from cost, and therefore you can in fact license your programs under the gpl and still sell them for money. As much as i love the work of the free software foundation, their focus has ultimately been anchored from the perspective that software absolutely has to be 100% free. Cb radios conquer the road with citizen band radio.
If youre just using a distributed multinode system inside your company, then youre entirely in the clear, as yan says. Consistent with the tenets of the open source software movement described above, the source code for mysql is available to the public and software developers worldwide are encouraged to contribute improvements and additional functionalities. But if we dont package our commercial software with jasperserver but we offer as an additional download the modified jasperserver could this not be a workaround and still offer us the possibility to implement with a case 2 like. The software that i am refering to is qgis which provides this description. Distributing in this sense means giving or selling to customers. For those who must work with staticallylinked implementations of multiple software standards, the gpl is often a poor license, because it precludes using proprietary implementations of the standards. It supports multiple file selection, file filtering, chunked upload, client side image downsizing and when necessary can fallback to alternative runtimes, like flash and silverlight. The gpl is designed to handle binary redistribution for software packages, but ours cannot be distributed in binary form. Nov 10, 2016 many proprietary software companies are infamous for their support for this very reason. It is therefore often thought that gpllicensed software is unsuitable for proprietary projects.
To get access to their product features, you have to accept whatever support they offer. For specific instances, read the license notices for the software package. Insert the word lesser before general in all three places in the boilerplate notice to make sure that you refer to the gnu lgplv3 and not the gnu gplv3. Jun 15, 2012 free software or copyleft licensing seems to have got off on the wrong foot with business, which is surprising given its many commercial benefits. Why the agpl is great for business users nextcloud. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain without. Versatas dcm distribution channel management was reverse engineered by ameriprise, who was using the product at the time. The gnu gpl is the most widely used free software license and has a strong copyleft requirement. You can find the legal text for the gpl here, but heres a quick summary of what it means. Plupload is javascript api for building file uploaders. This question cannot be taken seriously since of course you can submit an app based on gpl code. The software freedom law center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. It restricts you from using software to build nongpl software including bsdlicensed free software, but it prevents software from being taken private by commercial developers. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it.
Mar 26, 2015 the software freedom conservancy is suing vmware for its source code, claiming using linux source makes esx fall under the gpl. Since our project is an oo package written in php a scripting language the gpl does not quite apply. Some files are under the gnu general public license version 2 or any later. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software filed on feb 25. These licenses are incompatible with the gnu gpl version 3 gnu general public license version 2 most software distributed under the gplv2 allows for the software to be distributed under later versions of the gpl. Feb 25, 2006 advocates of the gnu general public license gnu gpl like to perpetuate the idea that programs released under it are free as in speech, not free as in beer. The gpl wont infect your proprietary software unless you link to it. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software to make sure the software is free for all its users. I have a concern of using gpl v2 and gpl v3 licensed software in commercial production environment. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law. However, businesses using gnu software in commercial activity, and people doing public ftp distribution, should need to check the real english gpl to make sure of what it permits. Ill split my comments on the third draft of version 3 of the gpl over a series of posts, each focused on one aspect of the license the user products clause has appeared in every draft of the gplv3, in various forms. Codeachi lms features training via documentation, live online, and webinars and youtube videos and.
Approximately 70% of the projects in the software repository sourceforge use the gpl v2. The viability of the gpl and commercial open source. The free software foundation considers the apache license, version 2. Apr 17, 2010 it restricts you from using software to build nongpl software including bsdlicensed free software, but it prevents software from being taken private by commercial developers. In order to use the gplcovered plugins, the main program must be released under the gpl or a gplcompatible free software license, and that the terms of the gpl must be followed when the main program is distributed for use with these plugins. Gpl v3 stipulates that any such favours must be extended to the entire community, undermining their effectiveness as a tool to realise business advantage through threat of.
The licensee may redistribute the software without any changes under the gnu gpl. Gnu general public license version 2 most software distributed under the gplv2 allows for the software to be distributed under later versions of the gpl. This document attempts to draw together the main features of the gnu general public license v2 into a friendly and comprehensible digest and, in addition, to. As a free software license, much of the stewardship and support for the gpl has been driven by the free software foundation.
In many countries, distributing software under gplv2 provides recipients with an implicit patent license to exercise their rights under the gpl. Can i use gpl software binaries in commercial environment. Aug 26, 2008 but even under gplv2, pure internet source distribution was a common practice and generally considered to be compliant. Jackie jen 2,723 points can i use gpl license as commercial. The gpl thus minimizes the number of programs that can be built using. You can support our efforts by making a donation to the fsf. For most of its history for 16 years from june 1991 to june 2007 there was really only one version of the gpl, version 2. The free software foundation may publish revised andor new versions of the gnu lesser general public license from time to time. And the licensee may modify the software or use it in his own projects.
There are multiple variants of the gnu gpl, each with different requirements. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free softwareto make sure the software is free for all its users. The software included in this product contains ed software that is licensed under the gpl. We disclose the software s source codes so that you may get, copy, distribute and modify it licensed under gpl or lgpl. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. This software is very easy to install to your windows computer and access it to multiple computer using lan. Remember that tivo used gpl code and never released their modifications, which upset a bunch of people and in part lead to the gplv3. Haufig gestellte fragen zur gnu gplv2 gnuprojekt free.
This general public license applies to most of the free software foundations software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. Essentially, since the gpl is about binary redistrubtion, it doesnt work with web pages where the output is distributed, but the software itself doesnt have to be. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. I would like to use haproxy as a load balancing solution. Promulgated in 1991, gplv2 is still after 23 years in service, the most widely used free software license of any type. Can i use the gplv3 license for my commercial application. A copy of that license is included in this document on page x. Codeachi library management system is globally trusted software for library automation. You may obtain the complete corresponding source code from us for a period of three years after our last shipment of this product, which will be no earlier than 20110801, by sending a money order or.
Wordpress is an open source software project, and a fierce believer in the values of the open web. Using deals like this, companies could create favoured versions of gpl v2 software which effectively had lower risks of patent litigation for their customers. Two way radios xtalker, gxtlxt, xt511 handheld radios. I wont modify anything from source code and the architecture of the system requires the use of a load balancer. The software freedom conservancy is suing vmware for its source code, claiming using linux source makes esx fall under the gpl. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the. Publishing translations valid for a single country only. We disclose the softwares source codes so that you may get, copy, distribute and modify it licensed under gpl or lgpl. Revised versions of the gnu lesser general public license. The boilerplate can be found at the end of the gnu gplv3 license. Free software or copyleft licensing seems to have got off on the wrong foot with business, which is surprising given its many commercial benefits. Gplv3 5 is the rewrite of gplv2 2, which was discussed in 5.
In fact, the fsf maintainers of the gpl have harsh words for licenses that try to restrict use of the software in any way. Mysql is an open source database application created by michael monty widenius and his colleagues. You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changesdates of in source files and keep modifications under gpl. Software freedom law center guide to gpl compliance 2nd edition. The main requirement that makes the gpl different from other software licenses is that he has to either supply the source code to his customers, or make it available to them on request. Incidentally, the gplv2 is written to be read by nonlawyers. Gnu gplv2 the gnu gpl is the most widely used free software license and has a strong copyleft requirement. However, you can obviously offer to send the gpl addon separate on. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. You may discover, however that these terms do not work so well in your favor, since one of the terms prevents you from a. We are considering the idea of publishing translations which are officially valid only for one country. With that said, dear techrepublic reader, the short answer to your first question is. Software licensed under the gnu general public license is free software, and all software that builds on gpllicensed components is also free and must also be licensed under the gpl. If you intend to use the gpld software strictly within.
Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software. When distributing derived works, the source code of the work must be made available under the same license. If you want to use gpl code from a package that already exists on ios in a commercial form to make a free form, then the developers are likely to let you use it. Gplv2 mentions internetonly distribution almost as aside in the language, in text at the end of the section after the three provisioning options are listed. It has been called the tivo clause and various other names, but by any name the basic principle is the same. Gplv3 looks like a worthy update open source initiative. Users or companies who distribute gpllicensed works e. If you want an example of including gpld software as part of a commercial offering, look at os x. Wordpress uses the gnu public license, which provides a platform for technical expansion and encourages adaptation and innovation. Nov 10, 2005 the gnu general public license v2 gpl v2 for short is the most commonly used open source licence. Software freedom law center guide to gpl compliance 2nd. The gnu general public licence, or gpl as its often called, is the most popular free software licence and its used by many different projects, including the linux kernel, the gnu tools and literally hundreds of others.
Contrary to what some have said, gplv3 will not cause a company to lose its entire software patent portfolio. Participate in discussions with other treehouse members and learn. As we need to package the software together it wont be possible to do this without a commercial oem license. Gplv1 is very different than gplv2 is very different than gplv3 especially with respect with whether you can distribute gpl based product using drm or if the distributor attaches a different license. Gpl software can also be modified without restrictions, as long as the modified software is kept private. Since both licenses cannot be satisfied simultaneously, binaries.
It simply says that if someone has a patent covering xyz, and distributes a gplcovered program to do xyz, he cant sue the programs subsequent users, redistributors and improvers for doing xyz with their own versions of that program. The move comes in response to growth in each of the companys four core service areasmanaged services, infrastructure solutions. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software. The gpl is far, far more authorfriendly than the bsd license is. Many proprietary software companies are infamous for their support for this very reason.
1323 1422 1156 233 808 260 1334 308 402 830 700 1262 591 1366 908 687 303 1439 1512 178 654 600 321 1560 566 85 1584 790 1517 545 1585 780 1232 111 189 581 1362 1315 1207 1333 1148 1029